Ahh! New comment spam!

Watch out for comment spam linking to facebook profiles.  I don’t know exactly what spammers get out of it but it seems to be becoming more common.  They add misspellings so that it’s not seen as a direct copy as easily.

For some reason, it fooled Akismet..

Notice the difference:

Unfortunately, Gnome-shell is not very good from a usabiladity peradspecadtive in its curadrent state. The deigsn (at least the big picadture) has not exactly changed that much since it was introadduced, and while A LOT of those who have tested it have given negadaadtive feedadback, Gnome has choadsen to stick with its deigsn. Just check out the comadments on every blog entry, every youtube video, every news item on the interadnet about the shell. Although I see posadiadtive feedadback as well, they are far between. That Gnome-shell have not taken this feedadback into conadsidaderadaadtion is just arroadgant and a big “fuck you” to the loyal Gnome usera0base.Its sad that Ubuntu felt they had to make their own shell, howadever, its even more sad that Gnome-shell have not lisadtened to the criadtique of the curadrent state of affairs.If I peradsonadally have to choose between Gnome-shell (as it is now) and Unity, I will go with Unity. I am sorry, but the curadrent way of switchading between tasks are just not acceptadable in Gnome-shell.

-Comment on my blog linking to facebook

Unfortunately, Gnome-shell is not very good from a usabil­ity per­spec­tive in its cur­rent state. The design (at least the big pic­ture) has not exactly changed that much since it was intro­duced, and while A LOT of those who have tested it have given neg­a­tive feed­back, Gnome has cho­sen to stick with its design. Just check out the com­ments on every blog entry, every youtube video, every news item on the inter­net about the shell. Although I see pos­i­tive feed­back as well, they are far between. That Gnome-shell have not taken this feed­back into con­sid­er­a­tion is just arro­gant and a big “fuck you” to the loyal Gnome user base.

Its sad that Ubuntu felt they had to make their own shell, how­ever, its even more sad that Gnome-shell have not lis­tened to the cri­tique of the cur­rent state of affairs.

If I per­son­ally have to choose between Gnome-shell (as it is now) and Unity, I will go with Unity. I am sorry, but the cur­rent way of switch­ing between tasks are just not accept­able in Gnome-shell.

Original real comment by Anonymous on

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *