Ryzen so far…

So my first iteration ended in a failed BIOS update…  Now I have a fresh MB.

Iteration 2 – disable everything

Ryzen machine is running pretty stable now with a few tweaks.   I was getting some memory paging bugs but one of things worked around it:

  • Moved from 4.10 (stock zesty) to 4.11 mainline kernel
  • Remove 1 of my 2 16 GB sticks of memory
  • Underclock memory from 2400 -> 2133
  • Re-enable VM Support (CVM)
  • Disable the C6
  • Disable boost

It was totally stable for several days after that..

Iteration 3 – BIOS update

Trying to have less things disabled (or more specifically to get my full 32 GB of ram) I did the latest (7A37v14) BIOS update (with all cables not important for the update removed).

Memtest had also intermittently shown bad ram… but I can no longer reproduce…  Both sticks tested independently show nothing is wrong..  Then I put both back in and it says it’s fine.

Part of that was resetting the settings above and although it was more stable I was still getting random crashes.

Iteration 4 – Mostly just underclock the RAM

  • Underclocked 32 GB of  memory from 2400 -> 2133
  • On 4.11 kernel mainline kernel with Nouveau drivers (previously on Nvidia prop. driver, but didn’t support 4.11 at the time)

So far it’s been stable and that’s what I’m running.

Outstanding things

  • CPU Temperature Reporting on Linux is Missing.  (AMD has to release the data to do so – see some discussion here.  That is a community project, posting there will not help AMD do anything)
  • Being coreboot friendly with these new chips
  • Update BIOS from Linux?
  • Why is VM support disabled by default? (It’s called SVM on these boards)
  • MSI please document/implement BIOS recover for these motherboards

Overall

Ryzen 1700 is a pretty powerful chip.  I love having 16 threads available to me (VMs/Compiling faster is what I wanted from ryzen and it delivers)   Like many new products there are some stumbling blocks for earlier adopters, but I feel like on my hardware combinations+ I’m finally seeing the stability I need.

*Stability testing was just leaving BOINC running (with SETI and NFS projects) with Firefox open.  And doing normal work with VMs, etc.
+ MB: MSI B350M MORTAR AM4
Ryzen 1700
2 x Patriot 16GB DDR4-2400  PSD416G24002H

When should i386 support for Ubuntu end?

Are you running i386 (32-bit) Ubuntu?   We need your help to decide how much longer to build i386 images of Ubuntu Desktop, Server, and all the flavors.

There is a real cost to support i386 and the benefits have fallen as more software goes 64-bit only.

Please fill out the survey here ONLY if you currently run i386 on one of your machines.  64-bit users will NOT be affected by this, even if you run 32-bit applications.
http://goo.gl/forms/UfAHxIitdWEUPl5K2

Xenial Wine-development Debian backports

If like me, you like having the latest version of Wine, I’m providing a very simple backport of the Debian Wine packages in this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bryanquigley/+archive/ubuntu/wine

This won’t likely ever have the stable wine versions in it; it’s just the wine-development (1.9.xx series) package.   I’m hoping to be able to get some of the versions tested in this PPA made available as updates to Xenial.

The Mozilla We’ve Got

This is a follow-up to The Mozilla I want from 2014 (same headings).  (I do post bugs and mailing lists links, but please don’t pile on them, that really doesn’t help)

DRM – Mozilla being played?

Nope, just non-Windows users being played so far [1]. I should have guessed with it being Adobe’s DRM that is being used that maybe Linux wouldn’t see the best support. It’s also depressing to me that Mozilla has given up on calling it what it is in some cases [2].

[1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155549

Abandon the DoNoTrack header, provide actual options

Mozilla has doubled down on DoNotTrack and our trying to get more companies to respect it with an add-on that blocks trackers if it’s not respected.  To be fair the EFF thinks this isn’t a lost cause either.. do they know something I don’t know here?  If anything it could be called DoNotMakeItAsObviousWeAreTrackingYou, that’s possible.

They’ve added DuckDuckGo as a preinstalled search engine!  Woot!

Push advertisers off of Flash (generally a good idea, but also will help with privacy – no flash cookies, etc) – Absolutely no progress on this[1] -The web is moving away from Flash and plugins but Mozilla is standing pretty still on pushing for it.  Guess Mobile and Chrome will get define this space.

[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.plugins/OmuCPoh5Fc0

SSL 3.0 – When will it go away?

That’s hilarious.  Really.   5 months or so after Mozilla removes the option to disable SSL 3.0 they have to make an add-on to disable it do to SSL 3.0 no longer being secure.

Could we just decide now to disable TLS 1.0 in 2018 or something? Maybe start warning about it in a year or so.  We know it has weaker security than TLS 1.2, so why wait until we have to do it in a panic?

Mobile – Firefox OS

I bought a ZTE Open C and it’s a cheap phone and had issues.  I’ve since given up on it and bought a ZTE Maven (Android 5.1) which I’m enjoying.  To be fair they both cost me about the same, but the Maven is a much better phone.

Mozilla hasn’t shipped a new version of Firefox OS since I bought the phone… Firefox 1.3 Released on 2014-03-17 is still the latest version (it’s 2015-08-01 today).  So much for the promised quarterly releases.  This isn’t even the harder “how long will you support this specific phone”, it’s just your schedule of releases.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases

Mozilla Adding unwanted things?

I really don’t mind Yahoo! Search (the new search widget rocks for using multiple search engines, imho), but adding Pocket just doesn’t make any sense to me.. oh well.

Signing add-ons I actually like and fully support.  What I didn’t like in that discussion was the idea that we can wait to figure out something for the enterprises, because they will be on the ESR release.   I’d prefer we try to bring everyone to be happy on the main release instead of making enterprises feel they really need to be on the ESR.

And Contributing!?

I’ve actual gotten my first (very very simple) patch into Firefox since my last blog post.  I’m hoping to do a bit more specifically around gstreamer.

Unfortunately, I’m feeling more like Chrome/Chromium provides a better and more secure out of the box experience for the average user today (Netflix, Flash updating, dropped NPAPI, much better video chat).   This is especially true on Linux.  It does help that Google has a specific platform (Chromebooks) that justifies investing heavily in it.

There is a lot of exciting stuff in the works (GTK3, wayland, electrolysis) and I’m going to at least stay around to see how that pans out.