Tag Archives: planet-ubuntu

Still running 32 bit Ubuntu?

I’m considering a proposal to have 16.04 LTS be the last release of Ubuntu with 32 bit images to run on 32 bit only machines (on x86 aka Intel/AMD only – this has no bearing on ARM). You would still be able to run 32 bit applications on 64 bit Ubuntu.

Please answer my survey on how this would affect you or your organization.

Please only answer if you are running 32-bit (x86) Ubuntu! Thanks!

If you can’t see the form below click here.

Ubuntu 14.04 LiveCD Memory Usage Compared

memoryusagegraph

I did a comparison when 14.04 was first released on the memory usage of different Ubuntu flavors.   Some takeaways:

  • Lubuntu has zRam (automatically compress memory to save space) enabled by default making it hands down the most usable version with low-memory.  It’s the only flavor to have it enabled on the LiveCD.
  • The real cost of 64 vs 32 bit is usually only 128 MB.
  • Lubuntu (32-bit) still boots with just 160 MB of RAM!
  • The Ubuntu kernel can’t boot with only 128 MB of RAM.

All testing was done in virtual machines (Virtualbox) and obviously with different hardware you’re results will vary.   You can infer some of my methodology from the notes below.   This was done months ago and I don’t remember all of the details.  The results may have changed with software updates, especially to Firefox.

Spreadsheet

Raw testing notes

Lead (Pb) in the USA

Live in the US?  Did you know that we put Lead (Pb), a known neurotoxin, in:

  • Garden hoses (that have been shown to leak Lead into the water)
  • Power cords (including laptop cords)
  • Carseats (mostly to the base, some other toxins have been found in the seat itself)
  • Likely more, it’s apparently not uncommon to be added to plastic…

In the EU you aren’t allowed to put Lead in the above.  I think it’s time we joined them!

  • Sign the petition on the White House We the People site.
  • Donate to this Indiegogo campaign to test carseats for toxic chemicals. (They are only asking for $10,000! ~ mostly to buy the carseats)
  • Share this post / the above with friends, family, and any celebrities you happen to know on Twitter, etc.  #NoSafeAmountOfLead.
  • Bonus: Watch episode 7 of the new Cosmos which ends with Neil deGrasse Tyson saying there is no safe amount of lead.

Please let me know if you have trouble doing any of the above..

The Mozilla I want

Somewhat a response to
https://webwewant.mozilla.org/en/
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/05/14/drm-and-the-challenge-of-serving-users/
https://fsf.org/news/fsf-condemns-partnership-between-mozilla-and-adobe-to-support-digital-restrictions-management

NOTE: These are more personal opinions and not necessarily those of my employer, your employer, or any of the businesses and government in my town,city, state, country.

DRM

It is *never* something people want.  Have you ever heard someone say “I really want this content I bought/”rented” to be harder to share/remix/watch and to have even greater legal ramifications if I do so?”  They do want content made by Hollywood, but those are different things.

DRM – Mozilla being played?

This reminds me of the time Chrome said it would drop H264 [1].   From what played out in public it seemed that Mozilla didn’t see the need to push for H264 sooner because they trusted Google to actually drop H264 support.

In a somewhat reverse situation, Mozilla just said they will adopt EME in Firefox before any of the possible benefits are realized by others.  Right now it’s being implemented only in Chrome and IE 11 [2], and I’ve only seen it used in Chrome OS and IE 11.   From my point of view I would have preferred if Mozilla had at least waiting to see if we will get more platform support from major vendors on this.  (aka Linux support for Netflix)

If so, maybe the increase in Linux market-share would provide some balance to the DRM’s negative affects.  Making free software overall a net win.   If so, I would (still reluctantly) support Mozilla’s decision here if they saw it as an end to get Hollywood media to more freer platforms.   But why not wait and see if this is actually true with Google Chrome/Netflix on Linux?

[1] http://blog.chromium.org/2011/01/html-video-codec-support-in-chrome.html
[2] http://html5test.com/compare/feature/video-drm.html

Reduce “Hollywood” power

I would like to see Mozilla pushing Indie/Crowdsourcing media, like:
Paid streaming site for indie videos https://indieflix.com/
Public broadcasting http://www.pbs.org/
Better publishing http://www.getmiro.com/
Basically, How can Mozilla use it’s capabilities to better change the media landscape?  (A slightly “better” form of DRM should not be the answer to this question).

Abandon the DoNoTrack header, provide actual options

It doesn’t work (and almost certainly never will) and it gives people a false sense of doing something.   You are giving advertisers another data point to track!  It literally does the opposite of what is supposed to.

Instead!

  •  Finish blocking 3rd party cookies (https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2013/02/25/firefox-getting-smarter-about-third-party-cookies/)
  • Promote (by adding it as a search option, etc) providers that promise to not track ANY of their users.   DuckDuckGo being the most obvious example.
    Their is so little difference between Yahoo and Bing search.. and DuckDuckGo is a damn good search engine[2].
  • Push advertisers off of Flash (generally a good idea, but also will help with privacy – no flash cookies, etc)
    Generally I’m supportive of the Click-to-play, etc initiatives Mozilla has taken thus far.  Flash is the exception to that rule.   Here’s the outline of a plan to push advertisers off of it. (the numbers are obviously made up for illustrative purposes)

    1. Start forcing Click-to-play for Flash when the site has more than 6 plugins running (pick some “high” number, and count all plugins, not just flash)
    2. Reduce the number of plugins to 5, after some number of Firefox releases or some specific Adobe Flash counting metric.  Repeat pushing to 4, etc.
    3. Once advertisers get on board and Flash ads aren’t served by the big advertisers, now we can push Flash to click-to-play at 2 instances per page.
    4. Once flash usage drops under 5% [1], we’d be able to push it to default click-to-play for all Flash.

[1] http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cp-flash/all/all
[2] http://libretechtips.com/reviews-internet/duckduckgo-comparison-google-bing-yandex

SSL 3.0 – When will it go away?

You’ve removed the (easy) option to disable it.  When will it go away for good?  Why does Chrome let the user see what protocol version (TLS 1.2 vs 1.0, etc) their users are using, but Firefox doesn’t?

Mobile – Firefox OS

Well I work at a direct competitor in mobile… but not actually working with our phone product..

  • Launching just with Facebook contact sync well, isn’t very open and totally goes against promoting those that respect your same values.
  • I get that you can’t magically make the devices more open, but at least can we get public commitments for how long a device will be supported for?  And how often it will get Firefox OS updates?
  • I wish you had used Thunderbird as Firefox OS’s email client… I think that would let it scale really really well and give you a new reason to push features there.. Maybe you are under the hood?

If you’re reading this and don’t know, you can try out Firefox OS (“Boot2Gecko”) on your desktop too! (https://nightly.mozilla.org/)

End on a positive note..

I love the new Firefox interface.  It’s awesome and makes customizing the browser much better.   I’m a nightly user and teach courses on Firefox.  I’m not going anywhere (fast) over the DRM decision.  Going to keep doing what I do and see how it pans out…