Tag Archives: firefox

Adobe Flash on Firefox/Linux EOL – Summary

We just ran a session [1] on what to do about the upcoming EOL for Firefox/Linux in 2017.  In short, we’re not planning to diverge from Mozilla’s direction.   The goal is to have Flash work today, and to become irrelevant over time.    Hopefully reaching the point of being irrelevant by 2017.  There are ways for you to help!  See below.

Distributing Firefox and Chrom/ium plugins now possible

A deal was reached with Adobe to distribute NPAPI and PPAPI Flash in Canonical Partners Repo!  (No more grabbing PPAPI from Chrome to get it to work in Chromium. No more “downloader” packages necessary for Firefox either.)  This should help make thin

How can you help make Flash go away?

On any browser, any platform (that has Flash of course)

Use less Flash.  See if you can do step 1.  If you can proceed to step 2, etc.

  1. Make Flash Click to Play.
  2. Disable Flash.
  3. Uninstall Flash.

To do these on Chrome, browse to chrome://plugins/,  On Firefox go to Add-ons -> Plugins.

If their is a site that doesn’t work without Flash, see if you can load their site on a mobile device.   Either way contact them and ask them nicely about removing the Flash content to get more hits, or for enabling at least the mobile site for non Flash users.

Run a Beta browser

Generally both Firefox and Chrome will push new web technologies in their Beta browser.  Many of them have the potential to help make Flash less relevant.   Help make them more stable by testing them!

https://www.google.com/chrome/browser/beta.html

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/

Run Firefox Nightly

Try running Firefox nightly.   We could always use more testers.  Specifically, we might get a more aggressive Mozilla when MSE is done being implemented (which should make youtube even more HTML5 video friendly).

Of course, there a bunch of other useful features Mozilla is working on to make browsing better.   Help would be welcome there too!  Report bugs on issues you have.

https://nightly.mozilla.org/

[2][3][4]

Other options considered.

  • We default to Chromium  – nope, let’s specifically NOT switch browsers over Flash. 
    • Outcome: That would send the completely wrong message.
  • We default to a compatible Flash alternative (Shumway, Gnash, Lightspark)
    • Outcome: That would just be a stop gap measure.  And we’ll always be playing catchup.
  • We add PPAPI support to Firefox ourselves / Hack it in
    • Outcome:  Non-starter.  Unless Mozilla adds it we don’t want the maintenance burden.

My Todo List

  • Investigate why Youtube Live videos sometimes don’t work without Flash. (Even in Chromium).
  • Figure out why my Nightly install doesn’t have working H264..
    UPDATE – because it’s not designed to yet!  See here – http://andreasgal.com/2014/10/14/openh264-now-in-firefox/
    If you have H264 working in Firefox it’s likely due to GStreamer support included in the Ubuntu (and many other distros) builds.  Upstream Gst1.0 support is waiting on infrastructure [3].

Hopefully I captured everything right.. but if I didn’t please let me know!

[1] http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1411/meeting/22354/adobe-flash-on-firefoxlinux-eol/
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1083588 testers wanted, run Firefox nightly
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=973274  Have RHEL 6.2 experience?  Might be useful there..
  – thread discussing how Firefox can be more aggressive against Flash.

The Mozilla I want

Somewhat a response to
https://webwewant.mozilla.org/en/
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/05/14/drm-and-the-challenge-of-serving-users/
https://fsf.org/news/fsf-condemns-partnership-between-mozilla-and-adobe-to-support-digital-restrictions-management

NOTE: These are more personal opinions and not necessarily those of my employer, your employer, or any of the businesses and government in my town,city, state, country.

DRM

It is *never* something people want.  Have you ever heard someone say “I really want this content I bought/”rented” to be harder to share/remix/watch and to have even greater legal ramifications if I do so?”  They do want content made by Hollywood, but those are different things.

DRM – Mozilla being played?

This reminds me of the time Chrome said it would drop H264 [1].   From what played out in public it seemed that Mozilla didn’t see the need to push for H264 sooner because they trusted Google to actually drop H264 support.

In a somewhat reverse situation, Mozilla just said they will adopt EME in Firefox before any of the possible benefits are realized by others.  Right now it’s being implemented only in Chrome and IE 11 [2], and I’ve only seen it used in Chrome OS and IE 11.   From my point of view I would have preferred if Mozilla had at least waiting to see if we will get more platform support from major vendors on this.  (aka Linux support for Netflix)

If so, maybe the increase in Linux market-share would provide some balance to the DRM’s negative affects.  Making free software overall a net win.   If so, I would (still reluctantly) support Mozilla’s decision here if they saw it as an end to get Hollywood media to more freer platforms.   But why not wait and see if this is actually true with Google Chrome/Netflix on Linux?

[1] http://blog.chromium.org/2011/01/html-video-codec-support-in-chrome.html
[2] http://html5test.com/compare/feature/video-drm.html

Reduce “Hollywood” power

I would like to see Mozilla pushing Indie/Crowdsourcing media, like:
Paid streaming site for indie videos https://indieflix.com/
Public broadcasting http://www.pbs.org/
Better publishing http://www.getmiro.com/
Basically, How can Mozilla use it’s capabilities to better change the media landscape?  (A slightly “better” form of DRM should not be the answer to this question).

Abandon the DoNoTrack header, provide actual options

It doesn’t work (and almost certainly never will) and it gives people a false sense of doing something.   You are giving advertisers another data point to track!  It literally does the opposite of what is supposed to.

Instead!

  •  Finish blocking 3rd party cookies (https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2013/02/25/firefox-getting-smarter-about-third-party-cookies/)
  • Promote (by adding it as a search option, etc) providers that promise to not track ANY of their users.   DuckDuckGo being the most obvious example.
    Their is so little difference between Yahoo and Bing search.. and DuckDuckGo is a damn good search engine[2].
  • Push advertisers off of Flash (generally a good idea, but also will help with privacy – no flash cookies, etc)
    Generally I’m supportive of the Click-to-play, etc initiatives Mozilla has taken thus far.  Flash is the exception to that rule.   Here’s the outline of a plan to push advertisers off of it. (the numbers are obviously made up for illustrative purposes)

    1. Start forcing Click-to-play for Flash when the site has more than 6 plugins running (pick some “high” number, and count all plugins, not just flash)
    2. Reduce the number of plugins to 5, after some number of Firefox releases or some specific Adobe Flash counting metric.  Repeat pushing to 4, etc.
    3. Once advertisers get on board and Flash ads aren’t served by the big advertisers, now we can push Flash to click-to-play at 2 instances per page.
    4. Once flash usage drops under 5% [1], we’d be able to push it to default click-to-play for all Flash.

[1] http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cp-flash/all/all
[2] http://libretechtips.com/reviews-internet/duckduckgo-comparison-google-bing-yandex

SSL 3.0 – When will it go away?

You’ve removed the (easy) option to disable it.  When will it go away for good?  Why does Chrome let the user see what protocol version (TLS 1.2 vs 1.0, etc) their users are using, but Firefox doesn’t?

Mobile – Firefox OS

Well I work at a direct competitor in mobile… but not actually working with our phone product..

  • Launching just with Facebook contact sync well, isn’t very open and totally goes against promoting those that respect your same values.
  • I get that you can’t magically make the devices more open, but at least can we get public commitments for how long a device will be supported for?  And how often it will get Firefox OS updates?
  • I wish you had used Thunderbird as Firefox OS’s email client… I think that would let it scale really really well and give you a new reason to push features there.. Maybe you are under the hood?

If you’re reading this and don’t know, you can try out Firefox OS (“Boot2Gecko”) on your desktop too! (https://nightly.mozilla.org/)

End on a positive note..

I love the new Firefox interface.  It’s awesome and makes customizing the browser much better.   I’m a nightly user and teach courses on Firefox.  I’m not going anywhere (fast) over the DRM decision.  Going to keep doing what I do and see how it pans out…

Help people move to L/Ubuntu from Windows XP!

In preparation for the Cherry Hill Library’s XP to Linux Installfest I made a website, presentation and worksheet.

AmISupported.com
Basic site designed to tell users if they are still getting security updates (right now just for Windows) and what their next actions should be.

InstallFestPresentation
Introduces Ubuntu and Lubuntu for non-technical users and also how today’s installfest will work.

InstallFestWorksheet
A place for the user to write down what they use their computer for.   And a place for the installfest helpers to write down what works/doesn’t in the LiveCD test.

Items mentioned in the worksheet: The liability release is specific to this Installfest.   As for the survey mentioned, I’m very curious just how many non-pae machines or 32 x86 machines there are still in the wild.

Let me know what you think and feel free to modify/use/whatever.  (If you need a license consider the docs under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License).

On the Mozilla CEO…

It[1] has already been demotivating and distracting from Mozilla’s mission.   How he responds to this is going to determine how really qualified he is to be CEO.  I think it could end up affecting Mozilla’s image permanently if not managed well, which is one of their biggest assets (Most trusted internet company for privacy)!

Two thought experiments I did personally ( I’m an atheist who feels marginalized by the pledge of allegiance including “Under God”) :

From CEO perspective

I donate $1000 to a political action committee pushing to remove “Under God” from the pledge.   Time passes.  I got a job opportunity to lead an amazing organization.   Members of the community start boycotting the amazing organization due to my donation.

From end user/employee/advocate perspective

I’m working at an amazing organization.   A new CEO is appointed that’s donated $1000 to make sure that we keep “Under God” in the pledge.   He promises to not change atheists position in the company and continue to treat them like any other employee.

 

I was originally going to suggest that the CEO just donate $1000 to the other side.. but I don’t think I would do that in his place.   From the employee perspective, I wouldn’t immediately resign or anything, but I would likely keep a wider eye towards new opportunities…  What would you do in your equivalent thought experiment?